Warning for brilliance.

[icarus]

I feel I must warn concerning the content of this post: ajhalluk attacks the matter of Fanfiction warnings with undue brilliance. Those who do not appreciate irony are hereby warned to avoid it, as well those who have a certain sensitivity to satire. But the concerns of the racists and anti-Semites really ought to be addressed. She left out a very important group, however.

Henceforth, I shall warn for "scientific content" on my Stargate SG-1 stories. I have implied, on occasion, that the laws of physics are not the acts of a divine being, and this may prove offensive to some.

I shall also, henceforth, warn for "Stargate SG-1 content" on my Stargate stories, for the sake of the scientists. I have implied, on occasion, that the lunatic science of this show might actually work in principle.

Comments

[electricandroid.livejournal.com]

I have just seen my first stargate episode SG1 1x01.

I think I am in love.

[icarusancalion.livejournal.com]

LOLOLOLOL! Jack? Daniel? Or both?

Icarus

[electricandroid.livejournal.com]

I DONT WANNA HAVE TO CHOOSE! WANT BOTH! NAKED! NOW!!!!

actually, it reminded me why I chose to go watch the stargate movie for my 14th birthday.

I'm feeling slightly depressed and nostalgic today. this is not helping :)

You good?

[ivy03.livejournal.com]

I have discussed with fellow writers before about how hard I find it to write techno-babble -- something that's meaningless, sounds cool and doesn't flagrantly break science.

They said it was easy.

Then I said I had a degree in Chemistry and had, in fact, taken quantum mechanics and know what terms like "stochastic optimization" and "inversion through a chiral center" mean.

They said ah. That's my problem, right there.

[sarka.livejournal.com]

Oh, Jesus, the science... you just have to take it with a grain of salt and consider it a really good dish :)

Off to read the rant!

[aizjanika.livejournal.com]

I shall also, henceforth, warn for "Stargate SG-1 content" on my Stargate stories,

:::giggle:::