A shift of perspective.
On the table for discussion: One Shakespeare essay.
My (unspoken) opinion of said essay: dry as dussssssst, uninsightful, dull, pedestrian, and ponderous in style.
Teacher's opinion of said essay: solid, well-argued thesis, strong conclusion, in need of only some fine-tuning to clarify my terms but essentially ready for prime time.
Whose opinion counts?
Yeah, thank goodness. I take it these literary bricks are normal in the field.
P.S. She didn't notice that I cited The Onion, and only felt my Robin Williams quote needed to integrated better (heh, since I threw it in in a fit of madness).
My (unspoken) opinion of said essay: dry as dussssssst, uninsightful, dull, pedestrian, and ponderous in style.
Teacher's opinion of said essay: solid, well-argued thesis, strong conclusion, in need of only some fine-tuning to clarify my terms but essentially ready for prime time.
Whose opinion counts?
Yeah, thank goodness. I take it these literary bricks are normal in the field.
P.S. She didn't notice that I cited The Onion, and only felt my Robin Williams quote needed to integrated better (heh, since I threw it in in a fit of madness).
no subject
no subject
I regularily quote Blackadder, Sir Humphrey Appleby (Yes Minister) and Monty Python in my essays and don't get flak unless it is used clumsily. Now I gotta use The Onion as well, because that is just a neat idea!
no subject
no subject
no subject
not quite the same situation, but still...