(no subject)
Aug. 6th, 2006 07:41 pmThe recruiting ads say there are 'over 200 ways to be a soldier.' Being openly gay is still not one of them.
Three students as part of "Right to Serve" challenge the military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy:
"They said we were morally and administratively ineligible for the U.S. military," said Jarrett Lucas, 20, of South Philadelphia, a recent Drexel University engineering student.
"They were very courteous, but they said that if we were truly interested in enlisting we'd have to conceal our sexual identities," Lucas added.
Lucas, joined by Shane Bagwell, 18, a high school graduate from Wyndmoor in Montgomery County, and Marissa Cotroneo, 19, an aspiring psychology major from Scranton, spent about an hour talking with Army recruiters and taking a practice qualifying test before leaving part of an Army of none.
The commander of the Army's Philadelphia recruiting station, Sgt. First Class Bell - she refused to give her first name - confirmed the trio's account of the meeting but declined to comment further.
In WWII we relaxed the anti-gay policies and looked the other way because we needed warm bodies to join. I wonder when the U.S. military will get desperate enough, given they're 40% short of their recruitment goals in all branches?
Three students as part of "Right to Serve" challenge the military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy:
"They said we were morally and administratively ineligible for the U.S. military," said Jarrett Lucas, 20, of South Philadelphia, a recent Drexel University engineering student.
"They were very courteous, but they said that if we were truly interested in enlisting we'd have to conceal our sexual identities," Lucas added.
Lucas, joined by Shane Bagwell, 18, a high school graduate from Wyndmoor in Montgomery County, and Marissa Cotroneo, 19, an aspiring psychology major from Scranton, spent about an hour talking with Army recruiters and taking a practice qualifying test before leaving part of an Army of none.
The commander of the Army's Philadelphia recruiting station, Sgt. First Class Bell - she refused to give her first name - confirmed the trio's account of the meeting but declined to comment further.
In WWII we relaxed the anti-gay policies and looked the other way because we needed warm bodies to join. I wonder when the U.S. military will get desperate enough, given they're 40% short of their recruitment goals in all branches?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 03:27 am (UTC)On the other hand, it does mean I have a bulletproof way to dodge the draft...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 03:37 am (UTC)I was particularly interested in this statement:
On the one hand I'm thinking, "well hell, it's about time." Such a dumb, circularly-justified policy.
On the other hand I'm thinking how utterly pathetic it is that it takes a severe shortage of volunteers during a badly mishandled "war" with no end in sight to make it seem like even an outside possibility that this policy might be repealed.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 03:55 am (UTC)Ya think? *eyeroll*
I'm just paranoid enough to imagine someone going to extreme lengths to keep a gay specialist from being open enough to cause embarassment.
I imagine there are a lot of rugs around, with large lumps of information swept under there.
On the other hand, it does mean I have a bulletproof way to dodge the draft...
I'm sure I could hook up with a nice lesbian chick if need be. Oh right, I'm 38 anyway.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 03:56 am (UTC)Of course, it doesn't stand a chance.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 04:02 am (UTC)But they've raised the enlistment age to 42. And reduced the fitness requirements for passing basic training.
Lucky us.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 04:15 am (UTC)They'll never get the draft through. They've been studying the option in "like hell we want to risk our careers over this" committees since January 2003.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 05:54 am (UTC)It's all about the image. In reality, nobody gives a shit.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 06:35 am (UTC)Yeah, it's all a dog and pony show. Maybe one day the higher ups will figure it out.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 06:55 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 07:01 am (UTC)The military's kind of funny; the hard-core, active-duty combat units (infantry, artillery, etc) are definitely all homophobic (hell, the Old School don't even want women in, let alone gays - I got in some good fights in my time), which is not to say that I didn't know a number of gay men in the combat units, albeit extremely closeted by necessity. But then the Reserve and the Guard are much more accepting of these open secrets.
The more progressive elements of the military are fairly even in comparison to the conservative ones, so my hope is that things will change before too long. Either way, they'll have to eventually; they'll have no choice.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 01:26 pm (UTC)Not during the Bush administration.
All I can say is, Vote Democratic, Y'All.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 01:48 pm (UTC)