Nimrod alert!
Jan. 26th, 2004 04:03 pmNot once. Not twice. But three times now (1997, 2002 and 2003).
The most recent comments:
"... the law violates the First Amendment because it improperly restricts access to a substantial amount of online speech that is lawful for adults. The decision follows a Supreme Court decision that sent the case back to the appeals court, which had previously ruled that COPA was unconstitutional."
As a voting adult, I applaud the Supreme Court decision.
Read the details.