Nimrod alert!
Jan. 26th, 2004 04:03 pmNot once. Not twice. But three times now (1997, 2002 and 2003).
The most recent comments:
"... the law violates the First Amendment because it improperly restricts access to a substantial amount of online speech that is lawful for adults. The decision follows a Supreme Court decision that sent the case back to the appeals court, which had previously ruled that COPA was unconstitutional."
As a voting adult, I applaud the Supreme Court decision.
Read the details.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 03:39 am (UTC);-)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 05:07 am (UTC)LOL
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 08:36 am (UTC)And researched wrong.
And has very bad reading comprehension.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:25 pm (UTC)Really. [/sarcasm]
Anyway, hearing that the trollish twat has a livejournal address to spam is great. We can now unblock one of the beast's ears and tell them the truth they are so blithe to ignore. ^_~
Ah karma. You such a beetch. (Now I've used up my important words list for a year! XD)