US Re-instating the Draft??
Mar. 1st, 2004 01:50 pmGovernment reinstating the *Draft?* Does somebody know if this is true or not?
I know from
wildernessguru (military analyst) that we need at least 150,000 troops to hold Iraq really, but what he believes this is about the dream to fulfill the cold war fantasy - the ability to fight on two fronts simultaneously. It's crazy, but the military still wants it. He says the goal is to get more combat forces instead of reservists.
- In North Korea we pulled our troops from dangerous positions so that they couldn't take out 40,000 of our troops with artillery.
- Also, a quiet deployment was sent to Guam. About 12-18 B-52s were sent there to be closer to North Korea.
Both of these actions are preludes to war. The correct term is "It puts you on a war footing." It's the equivalent of moving the 7th fleet a hundred miles off the shore of North Korea.
I know from
- In North Korea we pulled our troops from dangerous positions so that they couldn't take out 40,000 of our troops with artillery.
- Also, a quiet deployment was sent to Guam. About 12-18 B-52s were sent there to be closer to North Korea.
Both of these actions are preludes to war. The correct term is "It puts you on a war footing." It's the equivalent of moving the 7th fleet a hundred miles off the shore of North Korea.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-02 06:20 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-03-02 05:00 am (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-02 11:10 am (UTC)I just laid out the facts in the article, took a very dry tone and put as little spin on it as possible. If the facts themselves weren't so scary this would be the most boring piece I've ever written.
I also quoted huge sections from the bills themselves -- for credibility -- because it was hard to believe otherwise. When I just strung sentences and quotes together it sounded like I could have been taking things out of context, and when I didn't quote extensively it seemed like I might have made it up. This particular paper is very liberal and anti-Bush, and college newspapers don't have a lot credibility to start.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-03-02 11:22 am (UTC)*hugs* Proud of you for doing this darling :)