Okay, I'm Miss Meta tonight. After a looooong essay about Structure, I've posted story notes on A '57 Vincent And A Red-Headed Boy.
Also up, the little vignette, Welcome Home, Mr. General, Sir.
dragon_light will be stunned to hear I've already put those feedback forms on all 92 of my stories. I've got 92 stories. Holy cow.
Of course,
switchknife has, oh, ten million. But wow -- 92?
Also up, the little vignette, Welcome Home, Mr. General, Sir.
Of course,
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:03 pm (UTC)Has anyone else written Ron/Sirius? I don't think I've seen that one around (as rare as Ron/Snape, actually).
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:30 pm (UTC)I've never read any other Ron/Sirius. Hm. Odd that it's actually more rare than Sirius/Seamus.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 10:12 pm (UTC)Hey, I'm gonna do a post about this, but Straight Across The Desert (http://www.area52hkh.net/author.php?name=Icarus) is up on Area 52.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:40 pm (UTC)Besides, it's a great quote. :D
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 10:13 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 12:30 am (UTC)P.S. Why don't you link directly to your own stories? I know I don't always follow your links, simply because the amount of clicking it takes to get to a fic feels like a waste of time. That and the way the page is set up with the tiny text window in the middle and *shiver* links that open in a new window - wah! Sorry if I sound bitchy, I just would prefer direct links…
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 03:39 pm (UTC)I usually direct-link to the stories, but this week I'm working on something on my site, so I wasn't able to do that. I hope to resolve the issue, I just have to figure out a little programming trick... grumble, grumble.
Thanks for mentioning that tiny box. My screen is 800x600, so when we were creating the site, I never got to actually see the larger size until I checked it from work, months later. Would you believe that the box in the center on the larger screen size is smaller than the one for the little screen? I got a headache squinting at it.
I didn't design the site, so I have no idea how to fix it. I'm trying to tinker though. But I don't even have the Photoshop capability to create a new version of the picture.
I don't suppose... do you know how to do this stuff?
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 04:01 pm (UTC)Taking the target="_blank" out of links stops them from opening in new windows. Then the viewer has full control.
Would you believe that the box in the center on the larger screen size is smaller than the one for the little screen?
I believe it! I have 800x600, too, so the size isn't too bad (anymore - was it not smaller previously?), but the double scroll-bars and the non-url are irksome :o/
Any help I can give, I'm happy to. If you want to know "why frames are bad"/"why making links open in a new window is bad", google - people who know what they are talking about are far more eloquent than me :o)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 04:30 pm (UTC)My preferred style of website has all the links lined up on the left, and the pages opening to the right. Then it doesn't look like you're opening a new page, rather the display on the right changes. When I update my site I'll do something like that.
You shouldn't be getting a double-scrollbar however. What browser are you using?
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 02:14 am (UTC)Couldn't agree more! This wouldn't be a problem if you didn't use frames :oD
My preferred style of website has all the links lined up on the left, and the pages opening to the right.
And this can be done without frames, too!
You shouldn't be getting a double-scrollbar however.
Mozilla Firefox - both the webpage (the frames) have a scrollbar, plus the window has one :o/
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 02:02 pm (UTC)Have you slept? 92 stories? Wow! :)
And I'm sooooo glad it worked!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-25 04:32 pm (UTC)Yeah, one track. *chugga-chugga-chug-chug*
Icarus