(no subject)
Nov. 18th, 2005 09:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Happy birthday,
cursive! (There's one I'll never forget.) ;)
Hooray, you get to see GoF after all!
WG took me to see GoF. Well, I paid for the tickets and the candy. And the parking, come to think of it. But he drove.
Our verdict?
Forgetable.
We were talking about dinner and what videos we should pick up on the way home. I was looking forward to creating a spreadsheet for my winter classes.
Yeeah. Not exactly earth-shaking.
I think when you cut all the low points out of the story and string together all the tense moments, it falls a little flat. WG called it "an action movie" and I agree that the story was reactive, driven by the plot rather than the characters. It wasn't funny or playful like PoA (or the books).
But I did like the new Hogwarts, the Scottish hills, and this is Daniel Radcliff's best performance yet. For the first time I believed him as Harry Potter. Also, Rupert Grint stopped mugging for the camera, and Emma Watson is playing a character instead of just herself (thank goodness).
So, I'd dump the director (he's known for light comedy, Four Weddings and a Funeral, what?) and look forward to Order of the Phoenix. With the improvement in the acting all bodes well for the next part.
Oh, and I'm so slashing Harry/Cedric. ;)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Hooray, you get to see GoF after all!
WG took me to see GoF. Well, I paid for the tickets and the candy. And the parking, come to think of it. But he drove.
Our verdict?
Forgetable.
We were talking about dinner and what videos we should pick up on the way home. I was looking forward to creating a spreadsheet for my winter classes.
Yeeah. Not exactly earth-shaking.
I think when you cut all the low points out of the story and string together all the tense moments, it falls a little flat. WG called it "an action movie" and I agree that the story was reactive, driven by the plot rather than the characters. It wasn't funny or playful like PoA (or the books).
But I did like the new Hogwarts, the Scottish hills, and this is Daniel Radcliff's best performance yet. For the first time I believed him as Harry Potter. Also, Rupert Grint stopped mugging for the camera, and Emma Watson is playing a character instead of just herself (thank goodness).
So, I'd dump the director (he's known for light comedy, Four Weddings and a Funeral, what?) and look forward to Order of the Phoenix. With the improvement in the acting all bodes well for the next part.
Oh, and I'm so slashing Harry/Cedric. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 12:02 pm (UTC)Had never heard of the new director, but when I imdb'd him I saw he'd done a couple of TV shows I'd seen and liked....One of them was a kind of se7en-esque thriller, so hopefully should be good
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 06:27 pm (UTC)Thank god for the new screenwriter. The screenplay was almost as bad as some of the cheesy special effects.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 03:11 am (UTC)You'd think that the British director would have done a film with wit. Alas, not so. GoF had all the subtlety of Benny Hill.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 03:37 am (UTC)Cuaron was asked to direct GoF, but he turned it down because he'd still be working PoA at the time (the result of the production schedule being bumped several months due to the death of Richard Harris).
Icarus