I'm taking Shakespeare because:
1) I'm nine classes away from finishing my English degree.
2) No one, in my opinion, deserves an English degree without studying Shakespeare.
3) Three of my classes need to be pre-1800 literature.
4) Hey, Shakespeare. Cooooool.
One thing I forgot: I love Shakespeare.
I've never read Othello and I'm sure that the close-reading at some point is going to kill me, but Shakespeare has already, in the first Act, made me want to string up Iago (yon bad guy, the worst most ESE character he's ever written), and within pages the situation is so inutterably complicated. Oh yes, yes, I loathe Shakespeare's Sonnets, they're so pure and holier-than-thou, but his plays -- blood, guts, and mayhem! Treachery. Sex. Puns. Silliness. Madness.
I really ought to have gone to see Michael Shanks play Hamlet, even if the reviews were iffy. Speaking of madness.
And Romeo still cracks me up. "Oh woe is me, the beautiful girl won't have me -- oh wow, man. Check out Juliet, she doth teach the torches to burn bright! And I've got such a hard-on I took the skin off my nose!"
Although I've jaw-crackingly hard reading assignments. I'm leaping from medieval Muslim historians (with their casual and highly biased treatment of bloodthirsty raids "we swept to glorious victory with our heavily-armed calvary against the Buddhist monk idolaters") to classical Indian text language ("Thus have I heard. We are now going to repeat 90 names in a row, with diacritics, that you can barely imagine pronouncing...") to Shakespeare.
I can't believe it. Shakespeare's my light reading this quarter. Though probably the history's going to get a little easier as we approach more modern times.
1) I'm nine classes away from finishing my English degree.
2) No one, in my opinion, deserves an English degree without studying Shakespeare.
3) Three of my classes need to be pre-1800 literature.
4) Hey, Shakespeare. Cooooool.
One thing I forgot: I love Shakespeare.
I've never read Othello and I'm sure that the close-reading at some point is going to kill me, but Shakespeare has already, in the first Act, made me want to string up Iago (yon bad guy, the worst most ESE character he's ever written), and within pages the situation is so inutterably complicated. Oh yes, yes, I loathe Shakespeare's Sonnets, they're so pure and holier-than-thou, but his plays -- blood, guts, and mayhem! Treachery. Sex. Puns. Silliness. Madness.
I really ought to have gone to see Michael Shanks play Hamlet, even if the reviews were iffy. Speaking of madness.
And Romeo still cracks me up. "Oh woe is me, the beautiful girl won't have me -- oh wow, man. Check out Juliet, she doth teach the torches to burn bright! And I've got such a hard-on I took the skin off my nose!"
Although I've jaw-crackingly hard reading assignments. I'm leaping from medieval Muslim historians (with their casual and highly biased treatment of bloodthirsty raids "we swept to glorious victory with our heavily-armed calvary against the Buddhist monk idolaters") to classical Indian text language ("Thus have I heard. We are now going to repeat 90 names in a row, with diacritics, that you can barely imagine pronouncing...") to Shakespeare.
I can't believe it. Shakespeare's my light reading this quarter. Though probably the history's going to get a little easier as we approach more modern times.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 05:41 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:13 am (UTC)Okay, according to MS Online, he was with the Stratford Festival for two years. I looked that up, the description was this: repertory theatre festival producing, to the highest standards possible, the best works of theatre in the classical and contemporary repertoire, with special emphasis on the works of William Shakespeare.
Interesting. I've seen pictures and playbills from some of his performances. He looked awfully young, but I guess he was back then. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:19 am (UTC)I've been to the Stratford Festival. It's first-class. They do the period costumes and very true-to-the-time productions. It's an impressive accomplishment to have been part of it for two years.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 09:03 am (UTC)It's the... Harvard... of Shakespeare festivals in North America. Really. Doing Shakespeare at that level is very impressive. That's top rung. I think the other big Shakespeare venue is Ashland, Oregon, but they are less devoted to authenticity, the original form.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 05:47 am (UTC)I do believe that Shakespeare should be performed first before you ever study it. It's a lot more fun that way, because you start to understand the puns and the plays on word and the off-colour comments as you say them -- without having to dust off the books and be tested on finding them. And nothing livens up a class than a good sword fight.
Also, always study the comedies first. Muuuuch more fun.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 05:54 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 06:25 am (UTC)Romeo cracks me up, too. I've played him... twice? Three times? I can't even remember how many times I've been in Romeo & Juliet! *L* I've also played Mercutio, Tybalt, Abraham, and (of course) Juliet. It's my favourite Shakespearian play to be in.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:13 am (UTC)But it was such fun to throw a chair across the stage at Dromio, it truly was. :D
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 06:50 am (UTC)I really love Shakespeare now... in fact, when I got my master's degree, my thesis was an analysis of Henry V as presented in film and how different versions reflect the propaganda of the filmmaker's particular historical era. (Read: Laurence Olivier -- WWII issues, war as gloroius endeavour; Kenneth Branagh -- Vietnam issues, war as evil horror).
But man, Shakespeare is your light reading.
That is amazing.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:53 am (UTC)I really have got to see Kenneth Branagh's Henry V. I've been putting it off since I know I've got to put up with WG's whinging. Gah. He was bad enough during Romeo and Juliet, and that had naked boy hiney.
But man, Shakespeare is your light reading.
Let me give you a sample:
Contemporaneous with the conquest of the sind were the Arab victories over the eastern Turks of Transoxiana by Hajjaj's equally enterprising general Qutayba bin Muslim. In the north Qutayba's armies reached Shash (Tashkend) and in the south-east they penetrated deep into Kashghar, at that time part of the Chinese empire. Arab governors were appointed to administer the conquered provinces. When the Umayyad Caliph Sulayman (715-17) assumed power, Qutayba (like Muhammad bin Qasim) was disgraced, but he rebelled against his recall. He was eventually killed by his own army in 715. Proselytization in Transoxiana was more successful than in Sind. The spearhead of the proselytization movement were the sufi mystics, while the dihqans, hereditary aristocratic landholders who lived in fortified castles, responded to the call of Islam enthusiastically. The revenues remitted to the caliphate from this region were enormous, but from the ninth century their most valued contribution was the supply of Turkic slaves. Armed Turkic slaves supplanted not only the Iranians but also the Arab contingents as bodyguards and crack troops. They were loyal to none but their masters and were transferred by them like any other chattel.
From the ninth century onwards, certain enterprising leaders, backed by the Turkic slaves, began to carve out independent ruling dynasties in the eastern regions of the caliphate, paying only nominal obedience to the 'Abbasid caliphs. In Khurasan (the eastern province of Iran) and Transoxiana, Saman-Khuda, a dihqan in the Balkh district who had been converted to Islam, founded the Samanid dynasty, which ruled from 819 to 1005. Under them, Alptigin, a Turkic slave, rose to the rank of commander-in-chief of the guard (hajibu'l-hujjab) and, in the reign of the Samanid 'Abdu'l-Malik I (954-61), became the governor of Khurasan. When he was dismissed by 'Abdu'l-Malik's successor, he withdrew to Balkh, where he defeated the Samanid army in 963....
Not so bad, until you realize that every syllable has to be taken with a grain of salt. There is no proof that the sufis were all that responsible for spreading Islam, or whether they were "Hinduized" Muslims, for example, and this particular history was written in Pakistan with a particular very political spin.
Now for the Buddhists:
Thus have I heard. At one time the Buddha was dwelling in the city of the King's House (Rajagrha), on Grdhrakuta mountain, together with twelve hundred great bhiksus [mendicant monks]. All were arhants [men enlightened but not Buddhas], their outflows already exhausted, never again subject to anguish (klesa); they had achieved their own advantage and annihilated the bonds of existence, and their minds had achieved self-mastery. Their names were Ajnatakaundinya, Mahaksyapa, Uruvilvakasyapa, Gayakasyapa, Nadikasyapa, Sariputra, Great Maudgalyayana, Mahaktyayana, Aniduddha, Kapphina, Gavampati, Revata, Pilingavatsa (Pilindavatsa), Bakkula, Mahakausthila, Nanda, Sundarananda, Purno Maitrayaniputrah, Subhuti, Ananda, and Rahula -- such great arhants as these, known to the multitude. There were also another two thousand persons, including those who had more to learn and those who had not. There were Mahaprajapati, the bhiksuni [mendicant nun], together with six thousand followers. Rahula's mother Ysodhara, the bhiksuni, was also there together with her follwers. There were eighty-thousand bodhisattva-mahasattvas, all nonbacksliders in anuttarasamyaksambodhi [perfect enlightenment, that of a Buddha], all having mastered the dharanis....
Great stuff, but a trifle overwhelming. After this, Shakespeare's plays are rather direct and down-to-earth.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 02:53 pm (UTC)Othello is one of my favorites, possibly just because my girlfriend was in the hospital when I had to be reading it for class, so I'd sit in the emergency room and read it aloud to her. It made the freaky hospital lighting and beeps and smells all go away.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 04:10 pm (UTC)*Definitely* see Branagh's Henry V. It is by far the best adaptation of the play. He edits it rather ruthlessly -- I think only 40% of the text survives, but what is left is really easy to follow and *such* an indictment of war.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 07:40 am (UTC)But Iago--he's the most interesting villain, just beyond fabulous (I have a lot of love...)
At some point I recommend watching the BBC version with Anthony Hopkins as 'boot polish' Othello, it's so amusing :P
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:59 am (UTC)Iago is the ESE-est of the ESEs. *g*
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 08:07 am (UTC)You had a chance to see him? Oh, I'd have loved to have seen him in that. I only read that play a few months ago. My son had to read it for a literature class so we bought extra copies and he and I read it aloud (badly *g*), but it was so much fun. The more I read it, the more I wished I'd seen MS in the play, though I didn't even know who he was back then.
Have fun with your class! :-)
This is my favorite "Daniel with the Hamlet haircut" icon.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 09:05 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 11:23 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 11:02 am (UTC)But... Michael Shanks in Hamlet? AAaagh you break my brain! I'm about halfway into the second season (and I love it so far) but I can't imagine him as Hamlet.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 11:25 am (UTC)But... Michael Shanks in Hamlet? AAaagh you break my brain! I'm about halfway into the second season (and I love it so far) but I can't imagine him as Hamlet.
Wait till you get to season four. Watch "Absolute Power." Then tell me what you think of Michael Shanks as Hamlet.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 12:31 pm (UTC)I finally really got into Shakespeare a few years back, after I'd been reading more history and fiction in the period. I went to see As You Like It and was floored by just how bawdy it is. [And by how many parents brought small children, thinking it was innocent family entertainment.]
I agree that it needs to be seen in performace first; jokes don't always translate to print. Otherwise, Shakespeare for Dummies is an impresively good and friendly reference work, with play summaries and a helpful guide in the beginning to the language (geared to helping folks get the jokes)
BTW, have you seen
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 11:11 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 10:58 pm (UTC)classical Indian text language ("Thus have I heard. We are now going to repeat 90 names in a row, with diacritics, that you can barely imagine pronouncing...")
Bwah!!!!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-10 01:03 am (UTC)But anyway, I digress. Back to work!