Fascinating article
Jul. 15th, 2003 12:41 pmHarry Potter and the Banality of Evil
(Hey Brodie, does this sound familiar? Didn't we have this conversation back in March? *grins*)
Harry's punishment from Umbridge is similar to a scene in Kafka's The Penal Colony? Hmm.
'Beg Me For It' news. Well, I promised the next installment to my Beta today, but I've hit a snag in one scene. Almost there though.
(Hey Brodie, does this sound familiar? Didn't we have this conversation back in March? *grins*)
Harry's punishment from Umbridge is similar to a scene in Kafka's The Penal Colony? Hmm.
'Beg Me For It' news. Well, I promised the next installment to my Beta today, but I've hit a snag in one scene. Almost there though.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 09:24 pm (UTC)If the stories are all post-June 21, then we could actually give examples of stories from within the fandom that fit the criteria.
But the post-June 21 thing is actually the part that most bothers me. While I definitely see the merit in finding and feting new stories, I also think that the old stories and authors haven't really been given their due. Not properly. So I feel conflicted about that, as I just wonder if having this date as a cut off point will create a lot of ambiguity (first date of posting on a lj as opposed to at an archive, ongoing WIP's and series, etc.).
brodie
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 10:22 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 10:30 pm (UTC)I was wondering whether we could ask people to say *why* they were nominating a story - for interest's sake, and to create a little more self-consciousness about the nomination process.
We could either send an e-mail to the author asking for the date of initial online publication, or else go by the story's archiving on a major site ... but this seems like unnecessary work.
brodie