Drawing on the FanLib discussion, I have to say that I was invited to archive my fanfiction on FanLib back in March.
Well, ain't that fine and dandy. I was "personally selected" because of my great writing. Why did that sound like a credit card offer? (Bring fanfiction to the big leagues? Really. You're going to what -- publish it? Hmm. Just looks like another archive to me.) I scanned through the possible places they could have gotten my name at random.
Remember. I'm an author who posts everywhere. If anyone's going to turn up on a random search, it'll be me.
Then I remembered the Gen drabble I posted at, aha, Gateworld. Gotcha.
Curious, I checked FanLib out. At the time, they had only four authors on the archive. Three were so-called "Multi-Fandom Authors." There was something strange about these authors. First off, I'd never heard of them. Okay, okay, I don't know every author in fandom, and I'm certainly out of step with the immense Harry Potter fandom. But Stargate Atlantis, while prolific, hasn't been around that long, and they wrote slash. You'd think I'd at least run across a multi-fandom author on
sga_flashfic. Huh. Odd. I let that go.
Then each author had exactly two stories in each fandom they wrote for. Now, usually how an author becomes multi-fandom is they are a little obsessive. They'll go through phases where they write massive numbers of stories in a fandom and then flit to another fandom that they'll flirt with for a while. But, hey, maybe they were only uploading their two favorite stories.
Then I read some of the stories. They weren't bad. Whoever wrote them definitely had taken some creative writing classes. But they had that kind of awkwardness and close ties to canon that you see in an author's first story in a fandom. All of them. They started slow and uncomfortably. One had Rodney flipping a coin (and described the coin in vast detail) a reference to "Rising," in a Rodney/Carson story. I dunno. They felt forced.
They didn't reference fanon at all. It was like these authors existed in a vacuum. A multi-fandom author is usually connected to fandom in some way.
I decided that the owners of FanLib had hired some interns (okay, "hired" for an intern implies pay) to write some "fanfiction" stories to seed their archive. It annoyed me.
Then I was annoyed at the "bright colors!" and "bold stars!" layout. What is this, kindergarten? They didn't even know the average age of a fanfiction writer. The site seemed marketed to high school students. I contemplated sending them a scathing (if politely worded) email on how poor their market research has been, but I decided I didn't want to help them.
But here's the weird part: of those four authors, only cpt_ritter is still around, and cpt_ritter wasn't one of the "multi-fandom" authors. Once they got their archive started, they pulled their "seed" authors out.
Now I'll post my stories anywhere. I've joked that I'll staple them to telephone poles. But even I draw the line here. These guys were dishonest and manipulative. I don't trust them.
ETA: I agree with
astolat: It's time for a truly all-inclusive multi-fandom archive. Now there was one called The Archive At The End Of The Universe. Let me see if that's still in business.
Hi Icarus,
I saw some of your Stargate fan fiction online and really enjoyed your writing. I work for a brand-new fan fiction website called FanLib.com and my colleagues and I want it to be the ultimate place for talented writers like you. In case you're wondering, FanLib's not new to fan fiction. Since 2001, they've been producing really cool web events with people like CBS, Showtime and HarperCollins to bring fan creativity into the big leagues (see below for some links).
We're impressed by your writing and impact in the fan fiction community and we value your opinion. That's why we're inviting you to be among the first to experience FanLib.com. As a member of our Beta Team (not like "beta reader" but "beta software" that's still in development), you'll get an exclusive peek at what we're doing before we open the site to the general public.
Feel free to take a look around, upload some fics, maybe read and comment on a few. Do as much or as little as you like. On FanLib.com, you'll be able to connect with other first-rate writers like yourself, exchange ideas with the site creators, and get some of the fun stuff we're giving away to celebrate our launch.
Don't worry, you won't get spammed. We're not selling anything. We just want you to try the site and hopefully give us some feedback.
You'll need to use this special individual login to access the protected site:
http://beta.fanlib.com
Username: Icarus
Password: ****
(This is just to access the beta site and is separate from your site registration.)
We look forward to having you as a founding member. Together, we can create the greatest fan fiction site the web's ever seen!
Best,
Naomi
FanLib Beta Launch Coordinator
FanLib.com
Well, ain't that fine and dandy. I was "personally selected" because of my great writing. Why did that sound like a credit card offer? (Bring fanfiction to the big leagues? Really. You're going to what -- publish it? Hmm. Just looks like another archive to me.) I scanned through the possible places they could have gotten my name at random.
Remember. I'm an author who posts everywhere. If anyone's going to turn up on a random search, it'll be me.
Then I remembered the Gen drabble I posted at, aha, Gateworld. Gotcha.
Curious, I checked FanLib out. At the time, they had only four authors on the archive. Three were so-called "Multi-Fandom Authors." There was something strange about these authors. First off, I'd never heard of them. Okay, okay, I don't know every author in fandom, and I'm certainly out of step with the immense Harry Potter fandom. But Stargate Atlantis, while prolific, hasn't been around that long, and they wrote slash. You'd think I'd at least run across a multi-fandom author on
Then each author had exactly two stories in each fandom they wrote for. Now, usually how an author becomes multi-fandom is they are a little obsessive. They'll go through phases where they write massive numbers of stories in a fandom and then flit to another fandom that they'll flirt with for a while. But, hey, maybe they were only uploading their two favorite stories.
Then I read some of the stories. They weren't bad. Whoever wrote them definitely had taken some creative writing classes. But they had that kind of awkwardness and close ties to canon that you see in an author's first story in a fandom. All of them. They started slow and uncomfortably. One had Rodney flipping a coin (and described the coin in vast detail) a reference to "Rising," in a Rodney/Carson story. I dunno. They felt forced.
They didn't reference fanon at all. It was like these authors existed in a vacuum. A multi-fandom author is usually connected to fandom in some way.
I decided that the owners of FanLib had hired some interns (okay, "hired" for an intern implies pay) to write some "fanfiction" stories to seed their archive. It annoyed me.
Then I was annoyed at the "bright colors!" and "bold stars!" layout. What is this, kindergarten? They didn't even know the average age of a fanfiction writer. The site seemed marketed to high school students. I contemplated sending them a scathing (if politely worded) email on how poor their market research has been, but I decided I didn't want to help them.
But here's the weird part: of those four authors, only cpt_ritter is still around, and cpt_ritter wasn't one of the "multi-fandom" authors. Once they got their archive started, they pulled their "seed" authors out.
Now I'll post my stories anywhere. I've joked that I'll staple them to telephone poles. But even I draw the line here. These guys were dishonest and manipulative. I don't trust them.
ETA: I agree with
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:24 am (UTC)But yes, I remember her saying somewhere that everyone on the FanLib staff is a fan of whatever fandom and that she identified her favorite writers from her two or three fandoms and made sure they got invites. But I still have yet to see anyone involved in this discussion say that they'd gone over to the FanLib archive and browsed through the section for a fandom they were familiar with and recognize any of the writers represented there. So much for "The Best!!!"
Angie
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 05:58 am (UTC)The journal has been around since 2005, so that seems to be legit, but under the fic tag there's one measely story (and I don't read Wincest, so I didn't check it out). But really interesting is the homepage linked to. It's two other blogs, that have existed for only a few months each. One seems to be connected with tvguide.com and the other is a blog, whose apparently only purpose is selling stuff related to tv. Not a single piece of fiction in sight. And on her fanlib profile (god, what an eye sore) are 9 stories, most of them SPN. So really, for somebody who's been a fanfic writer for at least 30 years, her output is curiously low or interestingly badly advertised.
And saying that she's written a couple of published Buffy novels (in other words, tie-ins) doesn't make her a fanfic writer. Not every tie-in writer is a fanfic writer. Together with the very polished, marketing speech quality of her posts, this woman makes me very suspicious.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 06:39 am (UTC)Writing fanfic since 1970? No sign of it. The oldtimers have certain attitudes and a certain voice. She's nothing like them. Tie-ins are not the same, not by a long shot. There's no way someone who's been involved in fandom that long wouldn't know the whole history of C&D issues, up to and including George Lukas going apeshit and tearing after the Star Wars fandom.
I've nothing to do with Star Wars, and even I know about that.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 07:21 am (UTC)The way she went "I'm not aware of gender issues in fandom." when people noted the the whole board of directors of FanLib is male was another huge tip-off. I mean, lots of the misogynistic shit in TV-land, that pisses of the more feminist trained people in fandom, sails over my head by a mile and I'm aware of the gender issues in fandom.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 05:47 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:52 am (UTC)I found it revealing that their message of proudly welcoming their new friends Harper Collins, Showtime, Startrek.com and so on, does in fact not link to any website of those "friends". It links to the press release of FanLib, where again names get dropped but no links are provided. In fact, so far I haven't a single link to any of the PTB, that they claim to work with, on the whole site.
Then I checked out their Ghost Whisperer Contest. Only people from the United States and Canada are allowed to participate. Ok, it would be complicated to get some of their prices to Europe or Asia. But if you are a Canadian living in the Province of Quebec, you are not allowed to participate either. Why's that? Reading further along the rules of the contest, the very last point was the real kicker. The sponsor of the contest is not whoever is producing Ghost Whisperer. No, it's FanLib itself. So even if I'm willing to given them the benefit of the doubt and assume that the network or production company or whoever holds the rights of Ghost Whisperer works with FanLib, for me as a fan it seems almost impossible to verify that this is actually the case. So one of their big "selling points", sanction by the creators, is proven nowhere on their site.
And the reason I went to look for actual PTB involvement is, that I remembered that the copyright infringement discussion is actually a double-edged blade. When I was at Peg2 in Februray, David Nykl, irc, said when asked about fanfic (he brings it up himself) that the actors are not allowed to read it for the same reason that the production company does not accept unsolicited scripts: they don't want to open themselves to copyright infringement suits. They don't want some fan suing them for "stealing" an idea from a fic and using it in an actual ep. And I believe I heard long ago something like that is one of the reasons why Anne Rice blows a gasket over Vampire Chronicles fanfic. Which brings us back to anybody who's spent some time in fandom, is aware of the problems of shoving fanfic under the PTB's noses.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:00 pm (UTC)Still hinky, though.
Things that I believe about FanLib:
Date: 2007-05-18 06:12 pm (UTC)I dunno, when you don't trust someone it's easy to suspect everything about them. Here are the things that I believe about FanLib:
- They have some promotional agreement with Harper Collins, Showtime, Startrek.com, etc.
- They are a group of about 10 people or so who've sold this idea to the above, designed the site, did "research" on fanfiction (and oh, so badly). If it were a large organization we would not be hearing from them in LJ.
- They've spent millions on this idea, but most of that went into promoting the website to the big corporations (and furniture and paychecks and what-have-you). The website probably cost in the thousands.
- They have one person on board who has read Supernatural fanfiction, written one Supernatural fanfic story, who has at least one tie-in novel published for some fandom. As far as I can tell, s/he is their fandom expert. It seems to me, given that s/he's sent more targeted emails that I suspected (
- They intend to earn money off fanfiction writers' work with no return to the authors.
- They intend to hang the authors out to dry -- at least according to their TOS -- if there are any legal issues. (Of course, I doubt any judge would buy it. "What? We had no idea that they'd publish fanfiction here.")
These last two are what make me think of them as a pack of slimeballs.
Icarus
Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:Re: Things that I believe about FanLib:
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 02:30 am (UTC)But if you are a Canadian living in the Province of Quebec, you are not allowed to participate either. Why's that?
As much as I'd like to pillory FanLib for all sorts of things, that's a common codicil in Canadian contests. The gov't of Quebec has a different (and more stringent) set of laws around contests/winnings than the rest of Canada, and most companies simply hold a different contest in-province or skip Quebec altogether to deal with that difference.
*slips back into lurk*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:13 am (UTC)She's certainly not at the "core" of Spn fandom, and I don't think she ever was -- that's not a crime. Lot of people fit that category, including myself.
That said, I don't find her involvement with something like this at all surprising. All my interactions with her have been pleasant, and I have no reason to believe that she doesn't mean well; I just think she considers herself more a professional writer than a fanfic writer, and consequently has never really seemed to "get" fandom in the same way that others do.
(Also, as far as I know, the tie-in material she authored was not a novel, but a trivia book (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/002-4303448-5614464?%5Fencoding=UTF8&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=Cynthia%20Boris). I could be wrong, and there could be more Buffy tie-in material she's authored that don't show up on Amazon. But that's the only thing I'm familiar with.)
Hope that helps clear things up some.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:30 am (UTC)It's just that she said in that thread I linked to, that she's been writing in fandom for about 30 years. Now I'm not a writer myself, but I've been hanging around online fandom since the mid-nineties and I was surprised by her attitude. So I went and looked her up. And as you said, her main fandom seems to be SPN, which has only existed for 2 years. I was just pointing out that discrepancy. Maybe it came out a little harsh, but I feel very uneasy about the business model of FanLib and that makes me disinclined to cut people involved with it much slack. I admit, that's a failing of mine.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:58 am (UTC)Also, the oldtimers have a different set of attitudes. For example, slash had a slightly different meaning 30 years ago. She doesn't use the lingo like an oldtimer, or have an oldtimer's world-weary attitude. She may have written a fanfiction story as a kid (I did), but she's far too ... innocent? naive? ... to have been around fandom 30 years.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 10:00 am (UTC)I'm certainly not here to defend her character, which I know next to nothing about. I just thought it was a shame she was being dismissed so easily, when she was active in the fandom at one point (and still seemed to be until recently, just not as a writer).
:) Just hoped I could provide a bit of info, is all.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:38 am (UTC)She's certainly out of the loop on fandom issues like gender, the gift economy, and, very importantly, the legal status of fanfiction.
But mostly, FanLib didn't seem to get that fanfic writers aren't as hungry as profic writers. Pro writers will leap at the chance to get published. Fanfic writers on the other hand have droves of readers, a staggering number of archives, communities, challenges, mailing lists, Yahoo Groups, websites, and other outlets, rec-lists, communities, beta readers, and specialized knowledge (need a translation in medieval Latin? I can name two experts on my flist alone).
FanLib never recognized that they have nothing to offer us.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:53 am (UTC)I started reading her sometime around November 2005, to about February 2006. I'd seen that a story of hers got picked up by
... FanLib never recognized that they have nothing to offer us. ...
Yup. No argument from me.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 09:59 am (UTC)... FanLib never recognized that they have nothing to offer us. ...
Yup. No argument from me.
*g*
a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-18 06:25 am (UTC)She doesn't distinguish between Stargate SG-1 and SGA, so she's not a real fan there, though sometimes SG-1 fans refer to SG-1 as Stargate out of habit. That was one of their other mistakes from the original headhunt. I write for both and was confused instantly which one they meant.
There's no way she's interacted in fandom though. It took me, hmm, four months in the Harry Potter fandom to learn about C&Ds and the legal concerns.
But yes, I remember her saying somewhere that everyone on the FanLib staff is a fan of whatever fandom
Fan of whatever fandom, or fan of whatever show? I think that's part of the disconnect. FanLib doesn't know there's a distinction.
Icarus
Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-18 06:40 am (UTC)Which also makes sense, since my theory about their marketing and business plans assumes that those fans (the ones who just watch the show and such) are their true target audience. Those are "the fans" so far as FanLib is concerned. They're the ones who'll make them their money and it makes sense that those are the people the FanLib staff would be identifying with and thinking about.
Angie
Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-18 07:17 am (UTC)I don't think they're going to get the droves of readers they expect.
The other mistake they've made (among so many) is that assumed fanfic writers were as hungry as profic writers. New pro writers are desperate to publish. They'll leap at the chance to get their work on paper. Fanfiction writers are pretty fat and happy. We have plenty of readers, lots of praise, communities, reviewers, rec-lists, awards. We don't need FanLib. Even if they'd handled it well, they have nothing to offer us.
Icarus
Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-18 07:30 am (UTC)True. [nod] Fanfic fandom's always been a very small slice of active fandom as a whole. That's why I think they're going to be going for the larger audience of All Viewers. If your show has a million viewers, then even 20% of that is a lot of people. Even 1% is a lot of eyeballs for your ads, and they're a multi-fandom site so they'll be going for the fans (viewers, readers) of various fandoms.
I could see this going either way. A lot of people are predicting that FanLib will quickly crash and burn, and yeah, that'd probably be for the best. I'm not willing to be it'll happen, though. It might, but it might now. It depends what those never-before-active fans do and how well FanLib's marketing does at attracting their attention.
And you're right, we don't need them any more than they need us. If we could just each go our way that'd be very cool. Unfortunately, one of their crash-and-burn scenarios takes us down with them. That's what has me jittery. :/
Angie
Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
From:Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-20 09:03 pm (UTC)Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-20 10:08 pm (UTC)Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-21 05:47 am (UTC)Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-20 09:09 pm (UTC)Re: a fan Just Like Us!!
Date: 2007-05-27 08:11 am (UTC)