Huh? Post in Jenkin's blog on my behalf?
May. 26th, 2007 07:19 amSomeone named FANtastic has left a response in Henry Jenkins blog to remove the link to my FanLib summary. This person is obviously well-meaning, but I do not know them, and they never contacted me to ask my feelings about this.
Trust me, if I had a problem with being linked by Henry Jenkins, I would say so in no uncertain terms. I am jazzed that he linked to me. I'm a writer trying to get published and I've done some journalism, so exposure for something I've written? Is a good thing. I was once roasted for linking other people's work in public, so I'm careful about that now. But I'm not shy. My response has not appeared in Jenkins blog yet since he's at a conference:
* By the way, per
azurelunatic the transcript of the LJ Abuse team's reaction to the hoax ran something like this:
"That's so hysterical, no."
"... Ahahahaha..."
"Aahahahahahahahahahahahaha-!"
"Wincest sounds like a new product from Mr. Gates that promotes incest somehow. NEW FROM THE MAKERS OF WINDOWS. WINCEST."
Trust me, if I had a problem with being linked by Henry Jenkins, I would say so in no uncertain terms. I am jazzed that he linked to me. I'm a writer trying to get published and I've done some journalism, so exposure for something I've written? Is a good thing. I was once roasted for linking other people's work in public, so I'm careful about that now. But I'm not shy. My response has not appeared in Jenkins blog yet since he's at a conference:
FANtastic, I do appreciate your concern, but I am tickled pink that I was linked to Professor Jenkins' blog. In fact, I linked back to his post here in my summary.
A troll tried to attack my critical comments regarding FanLib on Mashable (comments that later became that summary) by linking to explicit fanart for one of my stories. I posted a link to the NC-17 story in question and a copy of my invitation to FanLib, suggesting they take a look at what they'd requested.
Belatedly, it occured to me that right below my summary was a series of story recommendations including NC-17 slavefic and steamy Wincest, and various links to other people who might not be too comfortable with the exposure. This morning I was sent an alarming message from several trusted friends who were as duped as I was by what turned out to be an LJ hoax concerning deleted LJ accounts. I've worked very hard to establish a readership and it would be a heavy loss for me. The hoax has been exposed* and I've locked reference to others' work. It's not a problem.
I guess we're all a little jittery at the exposure FanLib represents.
Icarus
* By the way, per
"That's so hysterical, no."
"... Ahahahaha..."
"Aahahahahahahahahahahahaha-!"
"Wincest sounds like a new product from Mr. Gates that promotes incest somehow. NEW FROM THE MAKERS OF WINDOWS. WINCEST."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 03:16 pm (UTC)Why did I feel compelled to leave them in the first place? It's not like anyone cares whether I'm... anyway. It's hard to explain a panic reaction.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 03:20 pm (UTC)As a side note, I posted about this on life_wo_fanlib but I searched the FanLib forums and haven't found anyone yet complaining that the fanfic.net importer doesn't work, though it should be blocked as of three days ago.
This may just be an indication that no one cares to import their stories there, lol. Stats have been remaining pretty static.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:12 pm (UTC)But slight panic? With such close scrutiny? I get that.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:43 pm (UTC)*sighs* Turns out the rumors were true after all.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 05:10 pm (UTC)JesusBill Gates Do?no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 06:41 pm (UTC)And I love the windows-wincest joke. ha ha ha . . .
no subject
Date: 2007-05-26 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-27 09:20 am (UTC)I love that.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 08:33 pm (UTC)btw, I've been appreciating your Fanlib commentary that I've encountered all over the place.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 09:16 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:10 pm (UTC)Which really, interms of flying below the radar... well - not what I'd think was such a bright move.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:31 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 10:00 pm (UTC)This doesn't seem coincidental to my mind.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 10:16 pm (UTC)I thought it was interesting that one of them had been outed by Fantastic over on Henry Jenkins' blog.
Mind you SN_slash seems safe as houses, so maybe it's utterly unrelated.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 10:57 pm (UTC)It was also brought up in
Here is a direct link:
http://www.warriorsforinnocence.org/2007/05/livejournal-allows-child-rapist-free.html
and the rest are here
http://www.warriorsforinnocence.org/search/label/LiveJournal
If it were just
By the way, I have not been able to post or clear this up in Professor Jenkins' journal.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 11:31 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 04:20 pm (UTC)Since then Professor Jenkins deleted FANtastic's comment from his blog.
Icarus