Ah. Legomymalfoy has posted.
May. 28th, 2008 08:41 pmLegomymalfoy has posted.
Apparently the death threat some (but not all) of the candidates were warned about was aimed at her, which I thought might be the case. (And I was hearing hints behind locked posts from her friends that
legomymalfoy was absent for good reasons that they couldn't talk about, candidates were asked not to talk about the threats, this was not hard to put together.) If you're going to send a death threat, you'd usually -- although not always -- send it to one of the main contenders.
My feeling about this?
ithiliana says it better: Clusterfuck 2008: The Race for the LJ AB.
Apparently the death threat some (but not all) of the candidates were warned about was aimed at her, which I thought might be the case. (And I was hearing hints behind locked posts from her friends that
My feeling about this?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:28 am (UTC)Then I figured it was either against
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:09 am (UTC)Hello? This is just a blogging site. No reason to ruin your life over this and threaten someone. Good for
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:19 am (UTC)--I know I should take this seriously, and evince deep and abiding concern, but all I could think was "we have hit new levels of absurd."
What is a credible threat over the internet anyway?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:36 am (UTC)For a threat to be credible, does the person making the threat need to indicate they know where you are so they can carry it out?
It would be hard for someone to make a credible death threat against me over the internet in that case. There are exactly five people on my f-list who've ever met me in person--and one of them's the boyfriend. About seven people on my f-list know my real name (and one of them's the boyfriend). Only the boyfriend has my address, although with a name, one can get an address if you work hard enough.
Other people are more open with their personal information than me, and go to cons and whatnot, or are friendly.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:52 am (UTC)And I'm relatively anti-social and somewhat paranoid. (The main reason I'm not more careful about life details? I live in a ghetto-ish area of Oakland; I fear no internet stalkers. If they can pick their way through the broken glass on the sidewalk and sidestep the used needles in the gutters, they're welcome to try to visit. Our home defenses are built for occasional neighborhood riots; I'm not worried about out-of-towners with a grudge.)
People who go to cons, who post reports about them, who manage fests and whatnot? Harder to hide. And a credible threat wouldn't necessarily mean knowing the person's address--a photo, and the knowledge of which Starbuck's they get coffee at, would be enough.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 06:26 am (UTC)All those of us who received the email were told was that a "credible threat" had been received, law enforcement was involved, and to tell them if we got anything more.
That's it. Nothing else.
Even when we asked if it was to anyone in particular, we were told "no comment." Asking for the police report number was met with "no comment." Asking if I should drop out for my own safety, I was told "do what you think is right."
So when a corporation tells you that a "credible threat" has been received, might have been made towards you, and that they've contacted law enforcement, what do you do? Chalk it up to lulz?
Really?
And anyone saying that I, or anyone else made this up needs to have their head examined. Never mind that the implication is insulting, making something up like that is pretty damned stupid, seeing as the truth would become known in short order when someone from LJ came forward and said, "What?!"
As it turns out, this ball was dropped by LJ. On their feet - and everyone else's feet.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 07:07 am (UTC)By the way, I owe you an apology. I was wrong. I've since spoken with RPGers who've told me that it's not at all uncommon to have 100 accounts. They just don't use them all at once. Apparently old RPG characters collect like clutter in the garage. Hardcore RPGers will also have accounts "on hold" for future games, in addition to their current games. They usually have them set up to go to the same email for the convenience of playing multiple games at once. I was amazed, but I guess it's no different from my writing 150-200 fanfics.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 07:17 am (UTC)Unfortunately, it might get even worse - but I'm under advice to now "shut the f**k up" and let LJ make their decision, so that's what I'm doing.
As for the account issue, I sincerely appreciate you bringing it up as you've done here. That shows class. The RP'ers I spoke with also told me that most go to the same email, but changing the email can be done pretty quickly if they're motivated to use the accounts to vote (which, to the credit of those I know, only one said s/he did, to the tune of about 200 votes).
no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 08:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-29 02:47 pm (UTC)