New spammer.
Oct. 16th, 2008 11:30 pmA sockpuppet account is spamming my old Fanlib posts. Again. These appear to be all the same person:
harrisybanes
lannateffetell
craigtaube
terrellhellums
howardclancy
mariahkopp
weldonarnett
If you'd like to ban them too, go to: http://www.livejournal.com/admin/console/
Type: ban_set [insert User Name here]
If you'd like to ban them too, go to: http://www.livejournal.com/admin/console/
Type: ban_set [insert User Name here]
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 07:41 am (UTC)If it's convenient, let me know their names, and I'll ban them as well.
What do they get out of this? I have a hard enough time just keeping up with my f-list and responding to comments from friends. I can't imagine why anyone would create extra work for themselves.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 07:48 am (UTC)terrellhellums
howardclancy
Yeah, I have no idea. They all said stuff that was vaguely tailored to the content of the posts/comments, too, so it must have taken some work, not just a random c&p job.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 07:59 am (UTC)In this case for example, a comment on a post about the LJ elections this summer had remarked about McCain. Tailoring it, sort of, but hadn't actually read the post.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 10:38 am (UTC)And since LJ doesn't have any other thingy to mark spam with, they're trying to get around that.
Me? I just flagged it anyway. Yah, it ain't explicit but it means that some yahoo from LJ has to look at the journal anyway.
I a stinker.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 03:37 pm (UTC)What is weird is that the first comment I got was coherent and actually more or less relevant to the post in question.
eta: it's even more bizarre than I thought... I googled a phrase from said coherent comment, and actually found what I assume to be the origin of the comment, word by word, here (http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:W8HD5h05RFgJ:rtil.newgrounds.com/news/post/86785+%22I+hate+how+almost+everything+with+a+popular+name+attached+to+it%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=de&client=firefox-a). The troll... plagiarized its comments? That gives 'pointless' a whole new dimension. *is very confused*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 09:57 pm (UTC)Comment plagiarism? *shakes head*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-19 09:34 am (UTC)I talked about this with friends, and we've come up with the hypothesis that we're not dealing with a flesh and blood human being on the other side. I think it's a robot program that's harvesting posts and comments all over the internet, and, when it finds similar patterns/key phrases in other posts, automatically reposts one of the comments from the original post there. That's why the comments are such a hit-and-miss deal.
We think it's a test run for some very crude AI, with someone on the other side harvesting the data in form of replies their auto-comments got... like, counting how high a percentage took the commenter for a real person. Their journals fit into that theory... each has one post that looks computer generated, ditto the usernames themselves.
I'm mostly annoyed that I wasted a perfectly good comment on some idiot who's playing around with spam software.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 03:56 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/swf/l.swf?swf=http%3A//s.ytimg.com/yt/swf/cps-vfl59689.swf&video_id=jMyNk8J1c8g&rel=1&hqt=1&eurl=http%3A//calpoly.facebook.com/note.php%3Fnote_id%3D31240712604%26ref%3Dnf&iurl=http%3A//i3.ytimg.com/vi/jMyNk8J1c8g/default.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskJVkFbo3zktAexPXWu7h6qh&use_get_video_info=1&load_modules=1&fs=1&hl=en
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 07:03 pm (UTC)