Drowning in Percy...
Oct. 17th, 2003 09:07 pmPeep-show: Whoops. Percy panics. Just how much has Ron guessed?
Dressing up: A little slice of life, preparing for Saturday night.
Legal trouble: A conversation cut short, tantalising tidbits from Percy's legal trouble.
It's getting intense: Ron and Percy spill some secrets. Almost.
And in the background, Harry knows something Ron doesn't: A newly opened mind, eh? I just happened to catch this one, when Ron mentioned he wished he hadn't said something....
Your friendly neighborhood
hp_dungeons addict,
Icarus
Dressing up: A little slice of life, preparing for Saturday night.
Legal trouble: A conversation cut short, tantalising tidbits from Percy's legal trouble.
It's getting intense: Ron and Percy spill some secrets. Almost.
And in the background, Harry knows something Ron doesn't: A newly opened mind, eh? I just happened to catch this one, when Ron mentioned he wished he hadn't said something....
Your friendly neighborhood
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2003-10-17 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-17 11:34 pm (UTC)Percy Ignatius Weasley, I do believe that Harry will have to ask you to dance with him on Sunday night.
*grin*
no subject
Date: 2003-10-17 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 02:20 am (UTC)Random
no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-18 05:57 am (UTC)Well, then...Percy should be prepared to faint. Because he's SO dancing with Harry.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 10:43 am (UTC)Ankle love shall be mine.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 03:20 pm (UTC)You're trying to snake my Percy away from me, out from under my nose! Shocking behavior. We all know who had first (or second or third) dibs on Percy.
If you think you have a better claim, I'll require that you provide some evidence. Otherwise... well.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-20 03:52 pm (UTC)I demand links! At least three to prove any prior claim.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-21 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-21 10:53 am (UTC)One could say that three is needed to provide sufficient proof because three is a perfect number, according to classic Aristotelian (if there is even such a word) virtues. Then one could add that once is chance, twice is coincidence and thrice is certainty. Finally, one could round out the argument by muttering on about scientific methods requiring at least three points of data to evaluate a hypothesis.
Alternately, one could say that I'm afraid you actually have one prior link and thus demand three in the hopes that you can't actually produce that many. *cough* Although that might be considered cheating. *cough*
no subject
Date: 2003-10-24 03:45 pm (UTC)*buffs nails*
I have evidently already won.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-24 07:34 pm (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2003-10-24 07:35 pm (UTC)