MFA programs: inner debate
Jul. 14th, 2010 11:28 pmI'm debating applying to an MFA program. Or MFA programs, rather.
The goal would be to teach at the junior college level.
The trouble is, I don't have a lot of confidence in college creative writing programs for me as a writer. I wonder if they implicitly teach a kind of literary snobbery.
Does the workshop process, where you throw your stories in the ring to a bunch of people who have little interest and no investment in them, really benefit the writer? Do stories "get better"? Do writers "get better"?
Or do they turn a kind of MFA product, stamped with the seal of approval that "this is now literature"?
What are the pedagogies behind different MFA programs? I keep running into people who tell me X writer who runs this or that program is truly great. Yet they can't tell me how they benefited. Instead they tell me, "Oh, yeah, he was really hard on me" with a kind pride that they could "take it." I'm unclear what the improvement was. Except for developing a thick skin.
I can tell you how I benefited as a writer from fandom. I can enumerate the beta readers, relationships, resources for research, and unflagging enthusiasm for stories. The challenges, the massive stories in short periods of time, the engine to finish that novel that comes from having an audience waiting for the next part, the sparking of creativity. There's a freewheeling joy in fandom that I'm not sure exists in MFA programs.
I wonder if it isn't more beneficial to just read. Just experience life. Turn off the writers the lens, the way a photographer needs to learn to get out from behind the camera.
Of course, I learned that particular approach from a professor who did an MFA.
The goal would be to teach at the junior college level.
The trouble is, I don't have a lot of confidence in college creative writing programs for me as a writer. I wonder if they implicitly teach a kind of literary snobbery.
Does the workshop process, where you throw your stories in the ring to a bunch of people who have little interest and no investment in them, really benefit the writer? Do stories "get better"? Do writers "get better"?
Or do they turn a kind of MFA product, stamped with the seal of approval that "this is now literature"?
What are the pedagogies behind different MFA programs? I keep running into people who tell me X writer who runs this or that program is truly great. Yet they can't tell me how they benefited. Instead they tell me, "Oh, yeah, he was really hard on me" with a kind pride that they could "take it." I'm unclear what the improvement was. Except for developing a thick skin.
I can tell you how I benefited as a writer from fandom. I can enumerate the beta readers, relationships, resources for research, and unflagging enthusiasm for stories. The challenges, the massive stories in short periods of time, the engine to finish that novel that comes from having an audience waiting for the next part, the sparking of creativity. There's a freewheeling joy in fandom that I'm not sure exists in MFA programs.
I wonder if it isn't more beneficial to just read. Just experience life. Turn off the writers the lens, the way a photographer needs to learn to get out from behind the camera.
Of course, I learned that particular approach from a professor who did an MFA.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-16 06:20 pm (UTC)I have a friend who got her MA in English- she's now teaching high school math. My mom's an academic advisor at a university and has been for two decades: it's a state school and they rarely have money to hire new faculty. High schools are constantly looking for math and science teachers (at least in the midwest) and are overloaded with applicants wanting to teach history and English- I don't know if it's the same for junior colleges, but I would not be surprised.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 02:33 am (UTC)I'm never going to teach math or science. I mean, my SAT math scores are in the 400s. The low 400s. So. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 04:26 am (UTC)Nursing's facing cut-backs, too. Also, I kill houseplants and have no patience for sick people. I'm a good teacher. And I believe in doing what one is good at. If you suck at a job -- or are mediocre at it -- you'll never have much success in it.
And I know people who've been able to make careers out of Sanskrit just because they're that good.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 04:09 am (UTC)My dad signed up for a community college creative writing class once. Only after the class started did he find out that the teacher was defining "success" as being able to get a story or article published in the local newspaper (which he already worked for). He had published two non-fiction books and a number of magazine articles -- travel articles and such. He brought his science fiction stories (which rock, IMO, but which were sent around to a zillion publishers and rejected by every single one, years ago) to the workshop things, and got comments like, "I thought the story was really interesting, really, but why are these people all giant lizards?" LOL!
Take with salt. :-D
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 05:45 am (UTC)I wonder if, though, who comes in for the guest faculty thing might be an interesting thing to consider, like, are those writers you think you'd like to learn from? I'm just tossing that out--I actually don't know if that would be a particularly good approach at all.
I do think that if your goal is teaching JC-level writing/creative writing, at least in my area, I know that many of the faculty names I see teaching in the vicinity are names I know from their time in the lit or comp lit grad program. So, maybe it would be worth checking around to see whether that's the case in your area? And whether that would influence what you choose to pursue?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 01:21 pm (UTC)from what i've read, (I do not have an MFA; my master's is in journalism) the MFA helps you as a writer ONLY in that it makes you block out oodles of time to write. It really doesn't do much for you in terms of honing your writing skills, and they vary immensely in terms of quality and approach.
(I am now teaching English at a university with my journalism master's. granted, it's not a Top 50 university, but it worked fine for me. I taught English at a comm college previously.)
The book "Conversations on Writing Fiction" by Neubauer might give you some very good advice. It's an interview style book with about a dozen well known literary fiction authors who are also writing professors. Of course, not being much of a reader of lit fic I didn't recognize the authors, but that's on me.
Good luck!