A sharp eyed reporter with a handle on law says "Huh?" to ruling on Twitter case. She notes the judge cited no case law in the decision (except one case irrelevant to the judge's ipse dixit ruling), instead drawing a comparison between "colonial billboards" and Twitter. (No, I don't remember colonial billboards from my high school history class either.)
She ends: "But please, give the case the scrutiny it deserves. The medium here isn't the message here. The message is the message."
ETA: Already blocked one vitriolic Cassidy account (can tell by the name and who else he friended) that friended me on Twitter. And it begins again....
She ends: "But please, give the case the scrutiny it deserves. The medium here isn't the message here. The message is the message."
ETA: Already blocked one vitriolic Cassidy account (can tell by the name and who else he friended) that friended me on Twitter. And it begins again....