First day teaching ESL
Apr. 27th, 2004 06:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
icarusSo today I met my new student. She's from China and speaks intermediate level English.
She comes across, of course, like a little child, or someone without much education. I know better from my own experience of trying to speak German and Tibetan, but our perceptions of each other are so based upon language - how we use it, our vocabulary, what we choose to say - that I was still surprised that she was college-educated.
Her manner was matter-of-fact about it. You could tell it was expected, not a special or proud achievement.
I recall that China used to have a real deep separation between the sexes. Women weren't educated at all, and there was a lot female infanticide. I know who changed this: Mao Tse-Tung, the same man responsible for the Cultural Revolution and the destruction of Tibet. I wonder how many revolutions are so double (and triple and quadruple) edged. The definition of evolution is just 'change over time,' but some changes we can accept and some we can't. The very same policy of equal education took my friend Kyid-pe from his nomadic family, shipped him to a Chinese boarding school where he wasn't allowed to speak Tibetan, where he was was told what his name was now... and given a Chinese name. The kids were cruel because in a school of a couple hundred there were only four Tibetans who weren't allowed to associate with each other because they were to be Chinese now. The Great Leap Forward.
When he went home, years later, he couldn't find his family.
To the school administrators, they were educating a barbarian, doing him a favour. Without their intervention he would have raised horses and yak and never learned to read and write. This was a goal we would laud. But he wasn't given an equal education. That would have been taking it too far, because he wasn't really Chinese. Even if he had a Chinese name.
I wonder if there's also a sense of educating women, but only so far. My college-educated student, her husband's a Chinese Physicist, a Ph.D. There's still female infanticide.
I suspect that the bind Kyid-pe was caught in has less to do with the Cultural Revolution, and more to do with Chinese culture as a whole - that view of outsiders as barbarians - and how difficult that is to change. I suddenly feel a little empathy for Mao, despite all the suffering his unilateral policies caused.
She comes across, of course, like a little child, or someone without much education. I know better from my own experience of trying to speak German and Tibetan, but our perceptions of each other are so based upon language - how we use it, our vocabulary, what we choose to say - that I was still surprised that she was college-educated.
Her manner was matter-of-fact about it. You could tell it was expected, not a special or proud achievement.
I recall that China used to have a real deep separation between the sexes. Women weren't educated at all, and there was a lot female infanticide. I know who changed this: Mao Tse-Tung, the same man responsible for the Cultural Revolution and the destruction of Tibet. I wonder how many revolutions are so double (and triple and quadruple) edged. The definition of evolution is just 'change over time,' but some changes we can accept and some we can't. The very same policy of equal education took my friend Kyid-pe from his nomadic family, shipped him to a Chinese boarding school where he wasn't allowed to speak Tibetan, where he was was told what his name was now... and given a Chinese name. The kids were cruel because in a school of a couple hundred there were only four Tibetans who weren't allowed to associate with each other because they were to be Chinese now. The Great Leap Forward.
When he went home, years later, he couldn't find his family.
To the school administrators, they were educating a barbarian, doing him a favour. Without their intervention he would have raised horses and yak and never learned to read and write. This was a goal we would laud. But he wasn't given an equal education. That would have been taking it too far, because he wasn't really Chinese. Even if he had a Chinese name.
I wonder if there's also a sense of educating women, but only so far. My college-educated student, her husband's a Chinese Physicist, a Ph.D. There's still female infanticide.
I suspect that the bind Kyid-pe was caught in has less to do with the Cultural Revolution, and more to do with Chinese culture as a whole - that view of outsiders as barbarians - and how difficult that is to change. I suddenly feel a little empathy for Mao, despite all the suffering his unilateral policies caused.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-04-28 07:08 pm (UTC)As with infancide, I don't have stastics, but it is not common. Espicially in cities, where most couples keep one child due to space, as much as the one child rule.(which is much relaxed now) It also doesn't seem right to blame the communist gov. for increase of infantcide; the cause of infantcide is b/c girl-child is not valued, not b/c of the one child rule.
Sorry to be so long, but once I got started, I couldn't stop. Although as exception goes, neither my mother or me have ever keep quiet, just b/c a man was speak. And my female boss, who came from a family of 5 sisters and one youngest boy had this to say:"He was the favorite, and we all knew it was only b/c he was a boy, so we all made his life HELL." Sometimes personal will marches on regardless of culture.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-01 05:55 pm (UTC)Also, interesting comments about female rights. I agree that traditional values are still very strong. I don't remember when divorces were legalized, but I believe they were very late, and even now there is strong stigma (mainly against the woman) for divorcees. Also, one of my friend told me stories of women being kidnapped to the country because the ratio of males to females are extremely skewed in certain areas.
As for university education, I wonder if Chairman Mao actually deserves as much credit as he received. He certainly campaigned for female rights etc., but Western universities were also fairly biased against women in post-secondary education prior to the nineteen-fifties/sixties. The large numbers of female graduates are a comparatively recent phenomenon. Would China have encouraged women to attend universities even if Chairman Mao didn't take power?