The MSScribe Report.
Jun. 20th, 2006 03:51 pmI tried to read the the
msscribe report, but somewhere around page two my head exploded.
The report's excellent, written in a journalistic style, carefully researched with disclaimers about unclear or missing information and almost completely without the usual "Rita Skeeter" glee you find in wankery and those who love it. charlottelennox has done a good job. The tone, at least as far as I've read, makes this much easier to stomach, despite the level of lurid detail.
That said, I couldn't stomach it. Lies, blatant manipulation, sock-puppetry of the worst kind where someone invents their own fans and their own pseudo-Christian troll. I fell for this, too, back when "The Black List" was published by
fandom_scruples on LJ in 2004. What it says about slashers' biases (and fears?) towards Christians (the real Christians apparently told the troll to turn the other cheek and whatnot) is a little disturbing.
It only occurs to me ... and please forgive my deep and abiding cynicism that arises from having exposed one LJ financial scam, dealt with a harrassing flurry of sockpuppets attacking
wildernessguru for criticizing certain pack designs -- (from a designer we know; the guy finally screwed up and dropped info he could only know in person via his sockpuppets, oopsie) -- and one rather persistant troll who hates my Buddhist stuff ... wouldn't it be something if this were all a final grab for attention by
msscribe?
I doubt it, but this oldtimer leans on the sidelines and waits for the other shoe to drop. *Icarus chews a toothpick, narrow-eyed*
ETA: Chatting with
sharp_tongue and
orca_girl, apparently in chapter ten charlottelennox explains how she got involved in writing this account. I haven't been able to read that far.
orca_girl points out it's the nature of this type of account for people to doubt it.
Yeah. I've run into that. People immediately want to distance themselves and show that "I'm an oldtimer" *cough* so "I'd never be fooled, nuh-uh, not me!" It's also a sign that the account is successful in making people alert -- too alert at first.
The report's excellent, written in a journalistic style, carefully researched with disclaimers about unclear or missing information and almost completely without the usual "Rita Skeeter" glee you find in wankery and those who love it. charlottelennox has done a good job. The tone, at least as far as I've read, makes this much easier to stomach, despite the level of lurid detail.
That said, I couldn't stomach it. Lies, blatant manipulation, sock-puppetry of the worst kind where someone invents their own fans and their own pseudo-Christian troll. I fell for this, too, back when "The Black List" was published by
It only occurs to me ... and please forgive my deep and abiding cynicism that arises from having exposed one LJ financial scam, dealt with a harrassing flurry of sockpuppets attacking
I doubt it, but this oldtimer leans on the sidelines and waits for the other shoe to drop. *Icarus chews a toothpick, narrow-eyed*
ETA: Chatting with
Yeah. I've run into that. People immediately want to distance themselves and show that "I'm an oldtimer" *cough* so "I'd never be fooled, nuh-uh, not me!" It's also a sign that the account is successful in making people alert -- too alert at first.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 12:47 am (UTC)That said, the report's style and presentation impresses the hell out of me.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:12 am (UTC)There are people out there like that, but luckily most of them have personal habits that lead them to experiencing the joys of prison. Or indicted by the SEC.
I do wonder why the effort to chronicle this so thoroughly. And another part of me wants to see something like it, but with an entirely different angle, anthologizing stories and their interconnectedness. I would enjoy that more.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:16 am (UTC)I'd love to see CL take another (more light-hearted) topic and research that. I'm feeling pretty hollow and exhausted after just reading this one. I can't even imagine how those who were involved must feel.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:25 am (UTC)I'm feeling pretty hollow and exhausted after just reading this one. I can't even imagine how those who were involved must feel.
I can, actually. Which is why it needed to be told.
It would be really cool to see another topic handled with this kind of thoroughness and dedication. I keep making noises about a fandom anthology, hoping someone will do it. I'll bet CL is pretty tired at the moment.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 04:06 am (UTC)You're kidding.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 04:10 am (UTC)You have no idea, which is why I've been encouraging people to read all of it.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 12:53 am (UTC)Also, dude,
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:14 am (UTC)Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:35 am (UTC)*thinks*
No. This was probably written by someone that
The only thing that concerns me is the bashing of
Hmm. I think I'll just stand over here with my toothpick and wait for the movie.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:34 am (UTC)I also think that it should be required reading for all HP fen because that one person caused so many of the major wanks that fragmented fandom in recent years.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:12 am (UTC)My experience with exposing cons is that you're always faced with people who'll doubt you, just because while reading the mess the readers become hyper-alert.
one person caused so many of the major wanks that fragmented fandom in recent years.
Yes. HP has a rep for being extraordinarily wanky, and I've got this image that the reality is a bunch of typical personality conficts -- and then this huge Hindenberg-like wanker eclipsing the fandom.
It's like ... going to a bank to rob it. Why? Because that's where the money is. She went to HP for attention. Why? Because that's where the audience is. And a bunch of BNFs for her to latch onto like a vampire.
*sigh* I need a bottle of Pepto-Bismol for this....
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:24 am (UTC)I don't know if it's 100% true, but parts of it have without doubt been corraborated by
It's really a story that once you get into the meat of it will just make you appalled that something like this could happen. But it doesn't surprise me that it happened in HP. Sigh. And it made me very, very aware of the history of a lot of the undercurrents that still exist in fandom today, whether or not people have stayed in the HP fandom.
And hon? You might need a case of Pepto-Bismol. :/ But it is a cautionary tale, and one I think needs to be kept in mind. I mean, this actually happened. *is staggered*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:42 am (UTC)From what little I have stumbled across, well, it matches up.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 01:41 am (UTC)I also honestly think that msscribe isn't actually accomplished enough to pull something like that off. It would be too dazzlingly schizophrenic, but someone who was *actually* that disturbed wouldn't, I don't think, be able to write something that long and detailed without slipping up. (Revealing info that she could not have gotten unless it was her writing it, for example -- which CL points out msscribe slipping up and doing a few times in reality, which is one of the reasons she is being implicated in some of the accusations.) Or, it would take a preternatural degree of self-awareness to be able to, in effect, construct msscribe as an alter-ego who engages in all these machinations, but to seed into each of them just enough hubris or carelessness that she is catchable in the end.
I also don't think that a number of the people who came forward and gave CL the documentation that resulted in the expose becoming that big -- people who had *already* gone to lengths to try to expose msscribe, with varying degrees of failure -- would have been fooled by a CL who was actually an msscribe-sockpuppet asking for that information. These are people who years ago realized how to trace at least some of this via IP addresses. And her IP address m.o. never changed. So how easy is it to believe that in one case and one case only -- CL -- she managed to pull off an IP scam so perfectly that she fooled the people *already alerted to* the IP pattern, and likely to look into it... unless they had CL vouched for in some other way?
But also, it becomes clear when CL does her "how this came to be" narrative at the end of part 10 that some of the folks from whom she got some of the evidence are folks *she* knows in person. So while we the readers don't know yet -- there's a lot of folks reading the thing as it was posted who contributed to it, who know who CL is.
All the vibe I get from her is that she used a pseudonym for rhetorical reasons, not because she feared saying this stuff or it damaging her reputation or anything. More, I'm guessing, because she feared more people might not read it if they saw her name on it, or would carry other preconceptions into it if they "knew" the author. That's why I'm hoping there'll be a reveal of her identity once people have read and absorbed.
It's fascinating. In a trainwrecky kind of way.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:21 am (UTC)Yes. While reading it people become hyper-alert to being conned and start questioning their shadows.
I ran into this with that financial scam, too. It's symptom that you're succeeding in waking people up, even if a little bit frustrating for the person who's carefully exposing the truth.
it becomes clear when CL does her "how this came to be" narrative at the end of part 10
That's what
It's fascinating. In a trainwrecky kind of way.
Femme's convinced me to read it as a sort of warning to fandom and to develop an understanding of what people can do.
All the vibe I get from her is that she used a pseudonym for rhetorical reasons, not because she feared saying this stuff or it damaging her reputation or anything. More, I'm guessing, because she feared more people might not read it if they saw her name on it, or would carry other preconceptions into it if they "knew" the author.
Now I'm curious who this is, and if it's someone I know or have heard of.
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:41 am (UTC)Honestly, I've mostly just skimmed it (and skipped many sections), looking for sections which intersected with my experience of fandom (like the scruples timeframe).
I don't entirely know what to think...
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:47 am (UTC)What she did (from what I've read from page one and two) is awful, but if everything checks out (note the hyper-alertness) let's not forget that we're stepping in as the red and blue lights are flashing and
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 02:36 pm (UTC)Oh, yes, there's a HUGE difference between CL's elegant style and msscribe's writing, which is pretty dire. I went & read a bit of msscribe's current LJ (it's now
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 06:50 pm (UTC)I have a post written about the whole thing from my angle, which really needs to be public if I post it... that said, I'm terrified of some of the F_Wers going to town with it. I don't think all the crappy behaviour has been on MsScribe's part- there's some seriously spiteful stuff going down which really doesn't feel appropriate when this many people have been hurt.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 07:29 pm (UTC)I have a post written about the whole thing from my angle
Really? Do, I'd like to see it.
I don't think all the crappy behaviour has been on MsScribe's part- there's some seriously spiteful stuff going down which really doesn't feel appropriate when this many people have been hurt.
Right now? Or in retaliation for MsScribe's actions?
Icarus
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 01:28 am (UTC)As for now- yeah. There are people on F_W who are in effect sneering "Ding Dong, the witch is ded (yay!)" I think it's understandable, particularly given that there were people on that side who weren't listened to, but seems to be a real note of "Nyah Nyah!" which is pissing me off. It just seems to be in poor taste at the moment.