That new Adult Content rating thingy.
Nov. 30th, 2007 01:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I changed my general settings to Adult Content then looked at my LJ.
All of my posts looked the same, with the same cut-tag. The only difference from one post to the next was the title and the music.
"Wow. What a boring journal," I said.
Eh. Forget it. I turned the settings off.
I have a percentage in being interesting to newcomers. Why read if I'm not?
I figure that between the Buddhism, school stuff, the whacked out mom (did I tell you about the time she told my friend Christopher he was the Antichrist?), David Hewlett videos, figure skating, laughing at George Bush our-new-peace-activist, annoying landlady, recs, memes, forgetting which toothbrush is whose -- yeah, I'm not seeing 50% explicit content. That setting's not for me.
In other news -- what did they do to TampaxTM? These haven't changed in 30 years and they're now... ow. They're short and stubby and too wide and shapped all wrong. Ow. This is not a place I want to hurt.
All of my posts looked the same, with the same cut-tag. The only difference from one post to the next was the title and the music.
"Wow. What a boring journal," I said.
Eh. Forget it. I turned the settings off.
I have a percentage in being interesting to newcomers. Why read if I'm not?
I figure that between the Buddhism, school stuff, the whacked out mom (did I tell you about the time she told my friend Christopher he was the Antichrist?), David Hewlett videos, figure skating, laughing at George Bush our-new-peace-activist, annoying landlady, recs, memes, forgetting which toothbrush is whose -- yeah, I'm not seeing 50% explicit content. That setting's not for me.
In other news -- what did they do to TampaxTM? These haven't changed in 30 years and they're now... ow. They're short and stubby and too wide and shapped all wrong. Ow. This is not a place I want to hurt.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 01:11 am (UTC)My mother used to buy the ones with applicators and I think they still sell them. I don't see any reason why not. Their commercials are usually for the plain ones though like you said.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 01:25 am (UTC)And I think the ads for those with applicators were mostly in magazines for young girls anyway.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:22 am (UTC)Humiliating experiences do tend to form strong opinions I think. Also people grow attached to their habits. (Also the reason why we LIKE products the way they've always been.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:38 am (UTC)O.B. had two problems. First the finger application, then they'd expand too much and be difficult to pull out.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 02:55 pm (UTC)The problem I have with tampos is that they tend to get close to the entrance when I pee, so I have to change them a lot. Of course I have missed most of my periods for the last half year or so (hormone issues), which is bad, because: hormone issues, but I can't really say that I miss the bleeding part, even though the only other symptom I usually get is having to pee a lot.