Vote, vote, vote.
May. 25th, 2008 12:43 pmI have two favors to ask of you.
First: Vote.
Second: Post about the Livejournal representative election. Urge your friendslist to vote and then post about the vote.
If massive numbers of fandomers surge to vote, then we will have our pick of fandom candidates. Instead of being a race between an anti-fandom candidate,
jameth and fandom candidate
legomymalfoy, we can have a race between
legomymalfoy and
rm.
I know we can easily reach 14,000 fandomers. I've added up the f-lists of those who've posted about the vote already. And you don't have to wait. Because you can change your mind between now and Thursday.
The three top fandom candidates:
legomymalfoy
rm
vichan
As of this moment, the numbers are:
jameth - 2508 (17.8%)
legomymalfoy - 3785 (26.9%)
rm - 1522 (10.8%)
vichan - 707 (5.0%)
I've nothing against this guy personally, but I don't like his paranoid campaign and troll history.
jameth attacked fandom once he fell behind, accusing us of sockpuppeting with up to 200 puppets per fandomer (seriously?) all based on an "anonymous tip." (Other moments that smack of conspiracy theories include fears that LJ is locking in votes and
jameth blaming
legomymalfoy for a supporter being kicked off IRC chat by burr86. Let's not forget the backhanded pre-emptive swipes at all the candidates, with the caption "I don't think _my_ platform is going to change. Not sure about anyone else's, though." Not someone I would want to work with. For more paranoia: He now fears Legomymalfoy's ahead because the LJ support team doesn't like him.)
Longstanding fandomers like
telesilla (whom you might remember from her reporting of strikethrough and FanLib) and
caras_galadhon and others, remind us
jameth is a known troll, while
bethbethbeth points out the strongly anti-fandom attitude of his supporters, which he's made no effort to contradict.
But hey, let's plague an epileptic's journal with flashing icons!
So I guess it should come as no surprise that his supporters are deliberately posting flashing icons in the comments of an epileptic's journal. At least one other epileptic has been affected, so turn off graphics if you click to
rydra_wong's journal. The
bigdecision08 community which is run by three
jameth supporters has posted about this, unfortunately directing
jameth's supporters to her journal. I've asked
jameth what, since he's seeking a leadership role and has been comfortable telling people to vote for him in all three categories, does he have to say about this? So far, although he's fine with directing people to vote for him and then null out in all categories, not a peep. To
rydra_wong it's not his problem. Nice guy. ETA: I asked him about it and he replied "what post?" This guy's totally full of shit. He'd already replied to
rydra_wong's post several times. He's attempting to run on his RL credentials, but I've learned in comments here that someone who's worked with him IRL "does not have complimentary things to say about his skills with dealing with people."
I've collected endorsements of
legomymalfoy here.
I've collected endorsements of
rm here.
We've got great candidates. The current second-place candidate is someone I don't want, I don't know about you. He is anti-fandom.
First: Vote.
Second: Post about the Livejournal representative election. Urge your friendslist to vote and then post about the vote.
If massive numbers of fandomers surge to vote, then we will have our pick of fandom candidates. Instead of being a race between an anti-fandom candidate,
I know we can easily reach 14,000 fandomers. I've added up the f-lists of those who've posted about the vote already. And you don't have to wait. Because you can change your mind between now and Thursday.
The three top fandom candidates:
As of this moment, the numbers are:
I've nothing against this guy personally, but I don't like his paranoid campaign and troll history.
Longstanding fandomers like
But hey, let's plague an epileptic's journal with flashing icons!
So I guess it should come as no surprise that his supporters are deliberately posting flashing icons in the comments of an epileptic's journal. At least one other epileptic has been affected, so turn off graphics if you click to
I've collected endorsements of
I've collected endorsements of
We've got great candidates. The current second-place candidate is someone I don't want, I don't know about you. He is anti-fandom.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 08:58 am (UTC)But 70 RP journals? *snorts* No way. No one I know has that many.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 09:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 06:39 pm (UTC)So.
Is he telling the truth that he has no influence over his pals? Then we can expect them to vote for him with all their lolcat sockpuppets, no matter what.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 06:58 pm (UTC)Either it's a problem, and a problem for everyone, as you indicate, above, or it's not.
This is the problem I have with this issue - first it's denied. Then, when proven it's happening, it's marginalized. Then, when credible evidence that it's happening more than just a little is put forth, both sides are accused.
No matter which point you take, however, the fact remains that this vote is being manipulated, fraudulently. Period.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 07:52 pm (UTC)What I'm noticing is that they're both your friends (or acquaintances) who've admitted to casting fraudulent votes. Tell me. Would we have heard about this if a candidate you were in the lead?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:33 pm (UTC)I was always behind. I never led, nor did I ever have a chance to lead. I brought up the issue a good day before he did, in fact.
Again, your ad hominem attacks do you no credit.
Whomever is in front is irrelevant. Would I have brought it up if I were in the lead? Maybe not!
Okay, so maybe if I didn't, in that case, I'd be a bad, bad person. Mea cupla.
The fact remains - there is voter fraud and the election is meaningless as a result. Call me all the names you want, question whether I'd have brought it up if I were winning, and make a strawman as to whether or not Jameth and I are good buddies (hint: I've never met the guy).
The facts remain.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:45 pm (UTC)Is the friend who told you she voted with 70 accounts
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 07:54 pm (UTC)That should read: What I'm noticing is that they're both your friends (or acquaintances) who've admitted to casting fraudulent votes. Tell me. Would we have heard about these friends of yours if a candidate you didn't like weren't in the lead?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 01:55 am (UTC)Jameth made a point of posting in his journal that he was removing the icons, setting an example for his fans. Although he did not specifically request that people take it down that I know of (and I think he should do that, despite the fact that one of his better friends is a photosensitive epileptic and the icon is far too small to cause anybody any harm), I have seen a sharp decline in the number of people using that icon since he took it down himself.
Having said that, with or without the seizure icon, I'm sure you'd keep finding other problems with him. I doubt asking his supporters to remove the icons would gain him any votes, and as I have already noted, it is too small to cause any problems for photosensitive epileptics. So the two possible reasons I see to take it down: avoiding physical harm, and winning more support, are moot.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 02:39 am (UTC)I know there's some political advantage to pointing at his icons and saying, "Oh, what a jerk," and I do oppose his campaign on the grounds that he attacked fandom (including me) when he started to lose. But I'm willing to toss politics aside to get rid of a real risk. I'm glad he got rid of the icons, but he has said no to posting about it.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 03:09 am (UTC)Also, as far as epilepsy is concerned, only photosensitive epileptics could possibly be effected by such an icon if it were, in fact, to have that effect. I am sure that if a credible source claimed it was physically damaging to them, James would tell everybody he knows to take it down in a heartbeat. Saying it is in bad taste is one thing, and anybody saying it is potentially harmful to *others* but not themselves could just be wrong, but if I see a single photosensitive epileptic who has been physically injured by this icon or is really worried that it could possibly trigger a seizure in anybody, I will personally urge James to take it down (not that I really talk to him much, but he's much more reasonable than you seem to think). James has gotten responses from friends who are in fact photosensitive epileptics to make sure the icon is not potentially harmful. He's not an evil person, and is not a jerk, even though many of the people on his flist are.
As far as attacking fandom goes, you already weren't going to vote for him. He made a post that has been characterized by many in the fandom community as stirring up drama, but I certainly don't see it that way - he received a tip, he posted about it, and it has since been shown to be true. Despite your claims that it is not widespread, or that people do it for James, too, his initial post has nonetheless been proven to be completely correct. James certainly doesn't hate fandom, though many people on his flist are hostile to fandom. Although I have never been much for writing fanfiction myself, I do enjoy it occasionally and count among my IRL friends some people who are cosplayers, furries, etc., even though I have people on my flist who have negative opinions of those sorts of things, so I think it's unfair to paint somebody with the opinions of some of the more obnoxious people on their flist. More importantly, even though you may be coming at it from different perspectives, James essentially wants the same things for LJ as fandom, and one of the main things in his platform is a strong stance against any form of censorship, something he has come out in force against on LJ in the past. I, for one, would not trust anybody from LJ Abuse or Support communities with anything related to first amendment rights, but I guess I'm one of the few who sees it that way rather than "James is an asshole; LMM is one of us!". For all the people ranting about this turning into a simple popularity contest, that seems to be exactly what it has become.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:47 am (UTC)As for not fandom never voting for him: no, that's not true (http://seperis.livejournal.com/607774.html). (Check the size of her f-list.) The initial response to him was positive. Most people in fandom didn't even know there was a vote. I didn't hear of it until Friday, 6pm. Saturday, my flist was still going "Vote?" and "Isn't this a cardboard badge?" It was his accusations Friday (http://jameth.livejournal.com/4349665.html) that pissed people off. Should've let fandom sleep through this one.
Personally, I was for
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 01:16 am (UTC)I didn't say that nobody from the fandom community was planning on voting for James, I'm saying that you in particular had issues with him anyways, and a lot of the vitriol being circulated against him (including a "credible" death threat, according to LJ staff) is either totally false (he didn't start LJ Drama, Frienditto, ED; he does NOT hate gay people because he's gay himself) or stretching the truth (he did NOT go into epilepsy-related communities and make seizure-inducing posts). I personally think you're taking the whole post about cheating the wrong way, after all, what he said did turn out to be 100% true, no matter how you spin it. Regardless of "James' people are probably doing the same thing", "it's only a couple of isolated cases", etc., the fact remains that the premise of his post has been proven to be true.
And with that, I am done with this. The fact that a "credible" death threat has been made means to me that this election wank is no longer worth it. I am grateful for your civility towards me. Good luck campaigning against James getting a cardboard badge.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 09:25 pm (UTC)Link here (http://news.livejournal.com/106731.html?thread=68522219#t68522219). From someone who used to RP, I could barely keep up with 3 accounts so it would be insane to have 70, but it appears it's been done by at least one person.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:00 pm (UTC)I checked her out. She's a major RPer, in at least five RPGs. But apparently all of those RP journals go to the same email. She wouldn't be able to vote more than once anyway.
I also checked out the people in that screencap that's circulating, where people talked about voting with alternate journals. I could only get a bead on two of the three names in the screencap, but neither are big RPG players.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:55 pm (UTC)You seem to be trying very hard to shoot down the obvious facts here with suppositions of your own.
Sorry, you must really think we're all stupid. I find that personally insulting.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:35 pm (UTC)It's a striking coincidence. This is the exact same number of multiple journals that
*checks*
He and this
I hate to call him a liar, but unless there was some sort of limit on LJ basic accounts (like a ceiling of 70 accounts for the same email?) it's a very big coincidence to have two people with exactly 70 accounts. Perhaps someone remembered her post and the story has grown around it since-?
Everyone in that thread expresses astonishment that she has so many. It's very unusual.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:57 pm (UTC)So this person coincidentally has the same number of RP accounts as my friend. Damn! What does this mean?
That we now have 140 accounts across two people?
No! That even though we now have one person admitting in public that she has 70 account, I must therefore be lying.
You really are some piece of work.
Again, you must take us all for fucking idiots.
We're done. I shan't reply to you anymore, you've shown that you're just out of touch with reality. Please, have the last word.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 11:18 pm (UTC)But since you'll take that as a yes and go on some kind of dismissive witch hunt, I'll humor you and say no. I have no idea who Leah is. The number is, indeed, coincidental, and only goes to show that now we have TWO people with that many accounts for role playing.
Or one, if you still don't believe me - and again, I'm fine with that. More than fine, in fact, since we now have someone who admits to it, so you don't need to take my word for it and concentrate on insulting me instead of dealing with the evidence.
And I meant it when I said I was done. I only respond here to spare poor Leah from your assumptions.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 11:26 pm (UTC)Likely not.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 10:47 pm (UTC)