Vote, vote, vote.
May. 25th, 2008 12:43 pmI have two favors to ask of you.
First: Vote.
Second: Post about the Livejournal representative election. Urge your friendslist to vote and then post about the vote.
If massive numbers of fandomers surge to vote, then we will have our pick of fandom candidates. Instead of being a race between an anti-fandom candidate,
jameth and fandom candidate
legomymalfoy, we can have a race between
legomymalfoy and
rm.
I know we can easily reach 14,000 fandomers. I've added up the f-lists of those who've posted about the vote already. And you don't have to wait. Because you can change your mind between now and Thursday.
The three top fandom candidates:
legomymalfoy
rm
vichan
As of this moment, the numbers are:
jameth - 2508 (17.8%)
legomymalfoy - 3785 (26.9%)
rm - 1522 (10.8%)
vichan - 707 (5.0%)
I've nothing against this guy personally, but I don't like his paranoid campaign and troll history.
jameth attacked fandom once he fell behind, accusing us of sockpuppeting with up to 200 puppets per fandomer (seriously?) all based on an "anonymous tip." (Other moments that smack of conspiracy theories include fears that LJ is locking in votes and
jameth blaming
legomymalfoy for a supporter being kicked off IRC chat by burr86. Let's not forget the backhanded pre-emptive swipes at all the candidates, with the caption "I don't think _my_ platform is going to change. Not sure about anyone else's, though." Not someone I would want to work with. For more paranoia: He now fears Legomymalfoy's ahead because the LJ support team doesn't like him.)
Longstanding fandomers like
telesilla (whom you might remember from her reporting of strikethrough and FanLib) and
caras_galadhon and others, remind us
jameth is a known troll, while
bethbethbeth points out the strongly anti-fandom attitude of his supporters, which he's made no effort to contradict.
But hey, let's plague an epileptic's journal with flashing icons!
So I guess it should come as no surprise that his supporters are deliberately posting flashing icons in the comments of an epileptic's journal. At least one other epileptic has been affected, so turn off graphics if you click to
rydra_wong's journal. The
bigdecision08 community which is run by three
jameth supporters has posted about this, unfortunately directing
jameth's supporters to her journal. I've asked
jameth what, since he's seeking a leadership role and has been comfortable telling people to vote for him in all three categories, does he have to say about this? So far, although he's fine with directing people to vote for him and then null out in all categories, not a peep. To
rydra_wong it's not his problem. Nice guy. ETA: I asked him about it and he replied "what post?" This guy's totally full of shit. He'd already replied to
rydra_wong's post several times. He's attempting to run on his RL credentials, but I've learned in comments here that someone who's worked with him IRL "does not have complimentary things to say about his skills with dealing with people."
I've collected endorsements of
legomymalfoy here.
I've collected endorsements of
rm here.
We've got great candidates. The current second-place candidate is someone I don't want, I don't know about you. He is anti-fandom.
First: Vote.
Second: Post about the Livejournal representative election. Urge your friendslist to vote and then post about the vote.
If massive numbers of fandomers surge to vote, then we will have our pick of fandom candidates. Instead of being a race between an anti-fandom candidate,
I know we can easily reach 14,000 fandomers. I've added up the f-lists of those who've posted about the vote already. And you don't have to wait. Because you can change your mind between now and Thursday.
The three top fandom candidates:
As of this moment, the numbers are:
I've nothing against this guy personally, but I don't like his paranoid campaign and troll history.
Longstanding fandomers like
But hey, let's plague an epileptic's journal with flashing icons!
So I guess it should come as no surprise that his supporters are deliberately posting flashing icons in the comments of an epileptic's journal. At least one other epileptic has been affected, so turn off graphics if you click to
I've collected endorsements of
I've collected endorsements of
We've got great candidates. The current second-place candidate is someone I don't want, I don't know about you. He is anti-fandom.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 02:32 am (UTC)Don't vote for him, whatever. That's your prerogative. But there's no reason for personal attacks on any side of this thing.
Why would I support
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:01 am (UTC)I'm not so sure. I spent some time this afternoon talking to him, getting a feel for what he's like. And while I'll agree that he doesn't take things seriously -- and when he gets pissed off he manages to retreat to a light tone -- I caught him in one lie, and a lot of wheel-spinning and shuck & jive. I didn't hear any sincerity from him.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:24 am (UTC)Personally? I think it was a mistake on his part to attack fandom. He should have portrayed himself as inclusive. After slamming us? He'll never convince fandom to vote for him.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:40 am (UTC)When exactly did he attack fandom? So much has happened in the past few days, it's hard to keep track of who said what first. Right now, it's just so much "NUH UH! YOU SAID IT FIRST!"
Ugh! So much trouble started over such a meaningless position.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:52 am (UTC)I have not accused fandom of sockpuppet voting. I have, however, accused this election of having sockpuppet voting.
There are those who claimed it wasn't possible. It's been conclusively shown that it is.
I've had two individuals claim to have done it to the tune of 70 and 200 accounts. I can't verify their claims, of course, but it seems logical to me that if something can be done, it will be done.
It will likely be done by both sides, to be honest.
So what do we have if that's true?
A fraudulent election.
And as someone who had no chance to win in the first place, I have nothing to lose by calling it as I see it. My goal was to get my positions out there, and I've done that.
But that doesn't change the fact that I find that multiple voting renders this election moot. At best.
(Edit to correct a doozy of a grammar error)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 03:59 am (UTC)As a fandom supporter who voted for
I've had two individuals claim to have done it to the tune of 70 and 200 accounts.
From our prior conversation you already know my views on that. I don't know anyone who can maintain that number of RPG journals (which are more work than a normal journal) and it is incredibly uncommon (in fact, unheard of by me) for people to have more than one or two. But we've been down this road already.
Bottom line: I don't buy it. And if they're telling you, then they must have voted for you. Obviously it didn't impact your chances.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:18 am (UTC)Both of them said that they did not vote for me. I think my numbers can bear that out.
But even if they're both lying, it can still be done. And RP users with 10 or 20 accounts, of which there are more than enough, could do it.
If it can be done, it will be done. To think otherwise is putting your head in the sand.
As for what Jameth said, he said that his tip named malfoy. So did mine. But in both cases, those are simply tips. I never asked anyone to take my word for it.
But now that we have people posting that they've actually done it, a few with 3 accounts, one with ten accounts... well, the die is cast. Because those who do it with more surely aren't going to out themselves.
So presume that all candidates are honest and encouraged no such thing. I'm prepared to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
Doesn't change the fact that it's still being done.
The vote is moot.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:25 am (UTC)Why would anyone go to the trouble to vote for someone 70 or 200 times -- and then reveal themselves? Wouldn't it be easier just to lie, and then point to the candidate you didn't want to win?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:51 am (UTC)To her credit, the 70-account person retracted her votes today, afraid that she'd be caught and lose her RP accounts.
The other one, not so much. He doesn't care, he thinks it's funny.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:57 am (UTC)In my fandom circles, which represents a sizeable portion of the people voting for
If one side's voting multiple times (why wouldn't your RL friends vote for you?) the other one probably is. They'll cancel each other out. Or do you think that
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 05:30 am (UTC)Why wouldn't a friend of
It doesn't make sense. I don't buy it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:51 pm (UTC)I think the RP contingent does, indeed, have less multiple account people in the 20+ range than do the trolls. But, that said, it's the trolls that worry me.
My RP friend said she voted for the fandom candidate because that's who she supports. I tend to hang out with honest people, in general, and she knows that she didn't hurt my feelings by speaking her mind.
The troll, again, not so much. I think there's a better chance that he feels that if there's enough stuffing, it'll create more drama. In any case, though, he's more of a real life "acquaintance" than friend, if you want to get the semantics straight. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 06:33 pm (UTC)Will they? Oh good. Then Jameth can tell people to stop deliberately putting flashing icons in epileptics' journals.
Oh. Right. I remember now. He told me he can't influence people. Well. Based on what he said, nothing he says will prevent people from voting with multiple sockpuppet accounts.
My RP friend said she voted for the fandom candidate because that's who she supports. I tend to hang out with honest people, in general, and she knows that she didn't hurt my feelings by speaking her mind.
I have to say that I don't have a lot of respect for your friend, or her so-called honesty. If she was so honest, what was she doing voting for anyone with 70 sockpuppets in the first place?
But, that said, it's the trolls that worry me.
The trolls won't vote for
Frankly, I've noticed you support
This story has holes like a collander.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 11:43 pm (UTC)Since voting is done by verified email address, having dozens of accounts doesn't give a person dozens of votes.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:05 am (UTC)I didn't even hear about this election until Friday night, and most people on my f-list were still saying "what election?" on Saturday.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:16 am (UTC)I really have to learn how to edit comments myself.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 05:07 pm (UTC)Anyway, thanks for the linkage in your election posts over the last couple days. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 07:05 pm (UTC)I want to thank you. Without your post I would never have known that regardless of the influence of the LJ Advisor post, we just don't want him on the same board as Bob Lessing.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:41 am (UTC)Here's the announcement of the Advisory Board (http://community.livejournal.com/lj_2008/3384.html), actually. So while I know you know this, the Board is no small potatoes, and it's incredibly important that any additions made to it are people who are well-situated to understand the issues under discussion, and are people who can be taken seriously as representatives of the userbase.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 02:14 am (UTC)It's like someone knocked out
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: